MATURITY MODEL

Where Does Your Data Warehouse Stand — and Where Does It Need to Go?

The On Point BI EDW Modernization Maturity Model defines five stages of data warehouse capability — from fragile legacy infrastructure to a fully governed, AI‑ready platform. It is a diagnostic framework and a roadmap, not an abstract scoring exercise.

Most organizations know their data warehouse has limitations. Few have a precise, shared understanding of exactly where those limitations are, how severe they are relative to what is possible, and what specific capabilities need to be built to advance. The On Point BI Maturity Model provides that clarity — and maps a direct path from your current state to your target state.

WHY THIS MATTERS

You Cannot Build a Roadmap Without Knowing Where You Are Starting

Modernization initiatives fail most often not because the technology is wrong, but because the starting point is not accurately understood. Teams underestimate technical debt, overestimate governance coverage, or target capabilities that are three maturity stages ahead of where their platform actually sits. The result is cost overrun, delivery delay, and a modernized platform that still cannot support what the business actually needs.

The maturity model changes that. It gives your technical leadership, your data governance team, and your executive sponsors a shared, accurate picture of current‑state capabilities — and a precise definition of what advancement at each stage actually requires.


THE FIVE STAGES

EDW Modernization Maturity: From Fragile to AI‑Ready

Each stage is defined by specific capabilities across five domains: pipeline architecture, governance and lineage, semantic consistency, infrastructure, and compliance readiness. Advancement through stages is sequential — the capabilities of each stage are prerequisites for the next.

Stage 1 — Fragile Legacy

Where many organizations discover they actually are

Organizations at Stage 1 operate a data warehouse that was built for a previous era of data volume, query complexity, and analytical demand. Pipelines are tightly coupled and brittle — a change in one place breaks something elsewhere. Batch windows are expanding. Governance exists as documentation but is not enforced in the platform. Data lineage is manual, partial, or absent. Compliance is managed through process rather than architecture.

Core limitations at this stage:

• Pipelines are fragile and expensive to change

• Governance is manual and inconsistently applied

• No end‑to‑end lineage — audit requests require manual reconstruction

• Infrastructure is operationally expensive and difficult to scale

• AI and advanced analytics are blocked by data quality and trust issues

What advancement to Stage 2 requires:

Pipeline stabilization, technical debt triage, and the beginning of automated governance and lineage instrumentation.

Stage 2 — Stabilized Foundation

The minimum viable modernization state

At Stage 2, the most critical legacy constraints have been addressed. Core pipelines have been stabilized or re‑engineered. Infrastructure has been right‑sized or migrated to cloud. Basic governance and lineage have been implemented — automated, not manual. The warehouse is reliable and operationally manageable, but semantic consistency is still limited and AI‑readiness is not yet present.

Capabilities present at this stage:

• Reliable, observable pipelines with documented dependencies

• Basic automated governance and data quality enforcement

• End‑to‑end lineage for priority data assets

• Right‑sized, cloud‑compatible infrastructure

• Reduced operational risk and batch window exposure

What advancement to Stage 3 requires:

Semantic layer development, KPI definition governance, and cross‑domain data model consistency.

Stage 3 — Governed Platform

Where analytics becomes trustworthy at scale

Stage 3 represents the transition from a reliable data warehouse to a governed analytical platform. A structured semantic layer enforces consistent business logic across all consumers. KPI definitions are managed in a governed registry. Cross‑domain data models are conformed and extensible. Lineage is comprehensive — covering not just pipelines but semantic transformations and business logic. Compliance requirements are met through architecture, not process.

Capabilities present at this stage:

• Governed semantic layer with enforced KPI definitions

• Comprehensive lineage — pipeline, semantic, and business logic

• Conformed dimensions and cross‑domain model consistency

• Compliance and audit readiness built into the platform

• Data trust sufficient to support enterprise‑wide analytics

What advancement to Stage 4 requires:

Real‑time capability expansion, ML‑ready data infrastructure, and advanced observability.

Stage 4 — Intelligent Analytics

Where the platform begins to drive decisions, not just report on them

At Stage 4, the data warehouse is no longer a passive reporting system — it is an active participant in business decision‑making. Real‑time and near‑real‑time capabilities exist where they create business value. Machine learning models operate on governed, semantically stable data. Observability is comprehensive — data quality issues, pipeline anomalies, and semantic inconsistencies are detected and surfaced automatically.

Capabilities present at this stage:

• Real‑time and streaming data integration for priority domains

• ML and forecasting models operating on governed, audit‑ready data

• Automated anomaly detection and data quality monitoring

• Governed AI/ML feature store or equivalent capability

• Executive and operational dashboards driven by a single authoritative semantic layer

What advancement to Stage 5 requires:

Semantic drift detection, cross‑system consistency governance, and AI‑ready data infrastructure at enterprise scale.

Stage 5 — AI‑Ready Governed Platform

The target state for organizations where data is a strategic asset

Stage 5 represents full data warehouse modernization maturity — a governed, AI‑ready platform where every data asset is traceable, every business definition is consistent across SQL, BI, and AI systems, and every analytical or AI consumer can trust the data it receives. Semantic drift — the gradual divergence of business definitions across systems, teams, and tools — is detected and governed automatically. The platform is not just AI‑ready; it actively enforces the semantic consistency that AI systems require to produce reliable outputs.

Capabilities present at this stage:

• End‑to‑end semantic governance across SQL, BI, documentation, and AI systems

• Automated semantic drift detection and resolution workflows

• AI and ML models operating on semantically stable, audit‑ready data

• Governed data as a competitive and regulatory asset

• Full compliance and audit readiness with platform‑generated evidence


UNDERSTAND YOUR CURRENT STATE

Where Does Your Organization Sit Today?

The On Point BI Technical Assessment maps your current environment to the maturity model — identifying precisely which stage you are at, which capabilities are partially present versus absent, and what the highest‑priority investments are to advance.

What the Assessment Delivers

A precise current‑state maturity mapping across all five domains. A prioritized gap analysis identifying the specific capabilities standing between your current state and your target state. A recommended modernization roadmap sequenced to deliver value at each stage rather than requiring full transformation before any benefit is realized. Investment estimates at each stage so your leadership can plan and budget with confidence.


TAKE THE NEXT STEP

Start with a Clear Picture of Where You Stand

The Assessment & Roadmap engagement delivers a complete maturity mapping of your current environment and a prioritized, phased roadmap for advancement — in 4 to 5 weeks, at a fixed scope, with a founder‑led executive briefing at delivery.

Already know where you stand? Review our pricing to see exactly what each engagement delivers.